The Runner's Diet
Is the Canada Food Guide Good for Endurance Runners? Some current nutrition literature suggests that athletes should just follow the Canada Food Guide and that they don’t need extra protein. This article will discuss whether the Canada Food Guide offers good advice to runners and other endurance or high-intensity athletes.

therunnersdiet
Atheletes have higher protein requirements than the Canada Food Guide recommends for average Canadians.
History

The Canada Food Guide was first published in 1942 and was known as Canada’s Official Food Rules. The purpose for publishing the document was to prevent nutritional deficiencies and to improve the health of Canadians during the very trying times of war. This was a time of poor access to food, insufficient money for food, and malnutrition developing in some segments of the population. The publication identified six food groups (Milk; Fruit; Vegetables; Cereals and Breads; Meat, Fish, etc.; and Eggs) and recommended quantities were base on seventy per cent of the published Dietary Standard. In 1944 they dropped the term “Official” and changed the recommendations to reflect one hundred per cent of the Dietary Standard. Cheese and eggs were included in the meat group, so now there were five groups. In 1949 they replaced a recommendation regarding fish oil and made specific references for supplementation of the sunshine vitamin know as vitamin D. In 1961 they softened the language and changed the name to a “guide” from “rules.” In 1977 fruits and vegetables were combined into one group, so now there were four groups, as there are today. Textual content and recommendations became more specific and were based on information collected by the Nutrition Canada National Survey (1973), which represented the largest, most comprehensive nutritional study of the Canadian population to date. There was also input from many health-professional groups and organizations. In 1982 the emphasis changed from preventing nutrition deficiencies to preventing chronic diseases, particularly heart disease. There was emphasis given to a moderation statement, which encouraged Canadians to limit fat, sugar, salt, and alcohol. Another change of emphasis in 1992 accompanied a name change to Canada's Food Guide to Healthy Eating. The major change was one of philosophy to embrace a total diet approach to choosing foods. Previous food guides were based on a foundation diet concept—they identified minimum requirements. The new guide emphasized meeting energy and nutrient requirements for healthy living.

The New Guide (2006)

The most recent version of the Food Guide still operates with the same goals as the 1992 revision but claims to have upgraded the graphics, created more options, included more ethnic food choices to reflect population changes, and attempted to make the Guide more individual. Based on age and gender you can outline your own personal Guide on-line and print it out. The problem with the Guide is that it does not take into account body size differences, and the only reference to physical activity is the admission that some may need more calories. It merely suggested that you eat more for all four food groups.

When I printed out two Guides—one for a male nineteen to thirty years and one for a male thirty-one to fifty years—the only difference was that the older male apparently required two fewer serving of vegetables each day.

Males 19-30 Males 31-50
Vegetables & Fruit 10 servings 8 servings
Grain Products 8 servings 8 servings
Milk & Alternatives 2 servings 2 servings
Meat & Alternatives 3 servings 3 servings









Some writers and even health practitioners have suggested that the Guide is not good for even the average citizen. Shortly after its publication, Dr. Yoni Freedhof, Medical Director of the Bariatric Medical Institute in Ottawa, wrote in the CMA Journal, February 2006, that the revised Guide was obesogenic. Dr. Freedhoff explained in one example that women between nineteen and fifty years who drank only water and ate no salad dressing and no dessert could take in as few as 1,700 calories, whereas other demographics could top 3,200 calories, again without the extras.

The Food Guide makes reference to using “small amounts” of oil and salad dressing, margarine and mayonnaise, and suggests that Canadians use low-fat products to reduce fat intake, all to alleviate the risk of heart disease and the propensity for obesity. It is interesting that the Canadian’s Eating Habits survey shows that average fat consumption is now at thirty-one per cent of calories, down from forty per cent in 1972. The American Heart Association regards thirty per cent fat as low fat.
In spite of this reduction, obesity continues to double every five years. Low-fat recommendations are based on certain assumptions that have become engrained in nutrition advice, but recent research has implied a need to re-evaluate these assumptions.

Further recommend reading on this subject can be found in Gary Taube’s book Good Calories, Bad Calories and a recent MSNBC.com article entitled “What If Bad Fat Isn’t Bad?”. Both will give you “food for thought” about the fat, cholesterol, and heart disease issue.

Carbohydrates are constantly referred to as the most important source of energy but if you review Respiratory Exchange Ratio data you will find that a resting body gets up to eighty-five per cent of its energy from fat. Even during moderate running at fifty-five per cent aerobic capacity fifty to sixty per cent of calories are burned will be from fat.

Foundation of the Food Guide Revision

The revision is an elaborate series of reviews and surveys of current eating patterns, an assessment of the methods provided in the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) reports, literature reviews of nutrition and chronic disease from the Institute of Medicine, as published in Public Health Nutrition 2004 (this was the major source of the “evidence base” the committee refers to), and finally their stakeholders’ feedback. The stakeholders included the producers, manufacturers, and marketers of food, and the inclusion of this group in the process has received considerable criticism. It has been suggested that the inclusion of the stakeholders led to a number of compromises like allowing fifty per cent of grain products to come from refined white flour.

Athlete Requirements

In addition to ensuring adequate energy supplies for long, intense workouts, endurance athletes need to pay particular attention to their immune systems and their protein requirements.

Adequate protein is necessary to repair and build a healthy immune system, and this means more protein than the average because during prolonged intense exercise we use more protein for energy.

Since muscle-tissue breakdown or damage is common during intense and prolonged exercise, those in training need more protein and the right proteins to repair and build or rebuild muscle. Although the recommended intake of protein in most standard food guides is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight per day, Lemon and associates at the University of Wisconsin and the Human Performance Lab at Penn State University and Vernon Young of MIT have all indicated evidence of higher requirements. This research has led many responsible sports nutrition coaches to now recommend 1.8 to 2.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day.

That would mean a seventy-five-kilogram runner (165 pounds) would need approximately 135 to 165 grams of protein per day. The Canada Food Guide and the DRIs would recommend sixty grams. With three servings of meat and alternative and only two of milk and dairy the athlete would have difficulty obtaining seventy-five to eighty grams if he chose five servings from the higher-protein-per-serving options. It is true that there is some protein in selected vegetables but not enough to add another sixty grams to the total.

This short review, although far from comprehensive, leaves us with the conclusion that the Canada Food Guide falls short in offering the endurance athlete enough adequate guidance.
It would appear to be a well-meaning and ambitious project, but it may also be an impossible task to complete with credibility because of the large variations in nutrition requirements known in human biology.

Speaking of the “extras,”

A 2004 study of Canada’s Eating Habits, published by the Health Statistics division of Statistics Canada, reported that adults obtain twenty-three per cent (almost one quarter) of their Calories from a category called “other” (meaning outside the four food groups). These items include the following, in order of popularity:
Soft drinks
Salad dressing
Sugar
Beer
Fruit Drinks
Vegetable Oil
Margarine
Chocolate Bars
Potato Chips
Butter

[sidebar]
In evaluating the usefulness of the food guide I made the following observations regarding serving sizes, caloric variability, carbohydrate variability in fruits, vegetables and gains and protein variability in meats and dairy products.

The following fruit choices are all one fruit serving: Carb range 5 to 27 gm; Calorie range 23 to 105.

Carb gm Calories
½ cup strawberries
11 23
½ cup watermelon 
5 25
½ cup raspberries 
7 30
½ cup blueberries 10 41
1 apple 
21 81
1 medium banana 27 105



These Vegetable choices are all one serving: Carb range 1 to 15 gm; Calorie range 7 to 66.

Carb gm Calories
½ cup cucumber 1 7
1 cup lettuce  
2 12
½ cup V-8 juice
5 23
½ cup green beans 6 25
½ cup broccoli
5 25
1 medium carrot
7 31
½ leek 9 40
½ cup corn 15 66



These Meat & Dairy item are all one serving: Protein range 6 to 31 gm; Calorie range 60 to 263.

Protein gm Calories
75 gm Pacific oysters 7 60
75 gm scallops 
12 65
75 gm shrimp  
18 90
75 gm Eastern oysters 
11 102
75 gm tuna in water 20 102
¾ cup yogurt plain
6 104
¾ cup yogurt plain organic 10 110
75 gm Sockeye salmon
15 115
75 gm rainbow trout
19 115
1 cup 2% milk
8 121
75 gm pink salmon
15 130
2 eggs
12 150
75 gm lean beef cuts
18 150
75 gm lean ground beef
19 190
50 gm Cheddar cheese 12 200
2 Tbsp (30 gm) peanut butter 8 200
1 cup cottage cheese 31 203
75 gm fatter beef cuts 26 263



These Grain products are all one serving: Carb range 12 to 20 gm; Protein range 0 to 6gm; Calorie range 70 to 130.

Carb gm Protein gm Calories
1 slice (35 gm) bread 13 2 70
2 rice cakes (plain) 
16 trace 80
½ bran muffin 
12 2 85
1 slice (40 gm) sprouted wheat bread 18 6 100
½ bagel plain 20 4 100
10 Saltine crackers 20 trace 130


Guidelines include an instruction that half of grain products should be “whole grain,” and that means half can still be drawn from refined white flour products. Also, sprouted grain products are not even mentioned, and they tend to be higher protein and lower glycemic index items than the current list.

About the Author

L. Lee Coyne, Ph.D., wrote “The Runner’s Diet.” A Calgary-based nutritional consultant and lecturer, Coyne is also the author of Fat Won’t Make You Fat, The Little Book of Nutritional Nuggets, and the Lean Seekers coaching program.

"The Runner's Diet" was originally published in IMPACT Magazine's March/April 2009 Running Issue.

 

1 Comments

  1. Linking Canada Food Guide to the grocery shopping list At http://www.pointsmaster.com you can: Tailor the Canada Food Guide to a family or group Print a visual representation for use while preparing family or group meal Make a chart to visually divide each person’s plate at the table Create a shopping list based on the family’s food guide requirements It’s free and no registration required

Add Comment